<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Anarchy Without Bombs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com</link>
	<description>Cooperation Without Coercion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:25:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let the free market eat the rich! by Don’t fear the free market, part 3: Rich and poor &#171; The Rule of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/03/13/let-the-free-market-eat-the-rich/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don’t fear the free market, part 3: Rich and poor &#171; The Rule of Freedom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=152#comment-468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] taxpayers to pay for the defense of their property. (Find a more robust discussion of this topic here.) The police protect the rich and beat the poor, and yet everyone is paying for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taxpayers to pay for the defense of their property. (Find a more robust discussion of this topic here.) The police protect the rich and beat the poor, and yet everyone is paying for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration by Our New Net Zero Immigration Nirvana &#171; Libérale et libertaire</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Our New Net Zero Immigration Nirvana &#171; Libérale et libertaire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Two years ago at Freedom Democrats, I posted an article on Libertarianisim and Immigration that sort of languished at the time. A year later, my republishing of the article managed to achieve some degree of notoriety with Less Antman&#8217;s endorsement. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two years ago at Freedom Democrats, I posted an article on Libertarianisim and Immigration that sort of languished at the time. A year later, my republishing of the article managed to achieve some degree of notoriety with Less Antman&#8217;s endorsement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Machinery of Freedom now online! by Compendium of Sources to Learn About Anarchism</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/17/the-machinery-of-freedom-now-online/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Compendium of Sources to Learn About Anarchism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=155#comment-448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Machinery of Freedom &#8211; by David Friedman [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Machinery of Freedom &#8211; by David Friedman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let the free market eat the rich! by Compendium of Sources to Learn About Anarchism</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/03/13/let-the-free-market-eat-the-rich/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Compendium of Sources to Learn About Anarchism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 09:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=152#comment-445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Let the Free Market Eat the Rich [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let the Free Market Eat the Rich [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let the free market eat the rich! by Redistribution and the State — The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/03/13/let-the-free-market-eat-the-rich/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redistribution and the State — The League of Ordinary Gentlemen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 06:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=152#comment-444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Generally speaking, these are good ideas, though obviously actually getting to a point where we could undo patent law and zoning codes altogether would require a hugely steep uphill political battle. Indeed, many of Gary&#8217;s ideas would require enormous political will and resources, so even if they are not government solutions per se they are nonetheless solutions which the government will inevitably be a part of. Indeed, my example &#8211; organized labor &#8211; would require a political solution as well: repeal of Taft-Hartley and the Wagner Act in particular. All non-state solutions nonetheless require political process &#8211; which can make good libertarian policies really hard to actually achieve. 2. The operation of a freed market. When privileges are absent, capitalization costs are lower, and more people can enter the market. The result is more enthusiastic competition—and, of course, the practical effect of competition is to reduce profit margins and to make it harder for people to preserve entrenched economic positions. Freeing the market is itself an act of revolutionary redistribution, because, as Jeremy Weiland emphasizes, the free market will “eat the rich.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Generally speaking, these are good ideas, though obviously actually getting to a point where we could undo patent law and zoning codes altogether would require a hugely steep uphill political battle. Indeed, many of Gary&#8217;s ideas would require enormous political will and resources, so even if they are not government solutions per se they are nonetheless solutions which the government will inevitably be a part of. Indeed, my example &#8211; organized labor &#8211; would require a political solution as well: repeal of Taft-Hartley and the Wagner Act in particular. All non-state solutions nonetheless require political process &#8211; which can make good libertarian policies really hard to actually achieve. 2. The operation of a freed market. When privileges are absent, capitalization costs are lower, and more people can enter the market. The result is more enthusiastic competition—and, of course, the practical effect of competition is to reduce profit margins and to make it harder for people to preserve entrenched economic positions. Freeing the market is itself an act of revolutionary redistribution, because, as Jeremy Weiland emphasizes, the free market will “eat the rich.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let the free market eat the rich! by State vs. social redistribution</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/03/13/let-the-free-market-eat-the-rich/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[State vs. social redistribution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=152#comment-435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2. The operation of a freed market. When privileges are absent, capitalization costs are lower, and more people can enter the market. The result is more enthusiastic competition—and, of course, the practical effect of competition is to reduce profit margins and to make it harder for people to preserve entrenched economic positions. Freeing the market is itself an act of revolutionary redistribution, because, as Jeremy Weiland emphasizes, the free market will “eat the rich.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2. The operation of a freed market. When privileges are absent, capitalization costs are lower, and more people can enter the market. The result is more enthusiastic competition—and, of course, the practical effect of competition is to reduce profit margins and to make it harder for people to preserve entrenched economic positions. Freeing the market is itself an act of revolutionary redistribution, because, as Jeremy Weiland emphasizes, the free market will “eat the rich.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration by Reporter</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article. BTW, the Libertarian International Organization at http://www.Libertarian-International.org continues to encourage interest in universal free working residency, and activists are working with Ecuador to present a Pan-American treaty. Step by step.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. BTW, the Libertarian International Organization at <a href="http://www.Libertarian-International.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.Libertarian-International.org</a> continues to encourage interest in universal free working residency, and activists are working with Ecuador to present a Pan-American treaty. Step by step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration by Less Antman: &#8216;There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration&#8217; &#124; Independent Political Report</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Less Antman: &#8216;There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration&#8217; &#124; Independent Political Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 22:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Antman at Anarchy Without Bombs (originally posted June [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Antman at Anarchy Without Bombs (originally posted June [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Property Theft? by Stateless University, Registration Begins Tomorrow. &#171; On ALLiance</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/03/07/is-property-theft/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stateless University, Registration Begins Tomorrow. &#171; On ALLiance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=101#comment-379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Less Antman takes inventory of the peaks and valleys of the perennial debate on property theory.  And he dares to hint at the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Less Antman takes inventory of the peaks and valleys of the perennial debate on property theory.  And he dares to hint at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Nolan, R.I.P. by Johnny Robinson</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/11/21/david-nolan-r-i-p/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=157#comment-351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My best to any survivors, and here&#039;s to a True American!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My best to any survivors, and here&#8217;s to a True American!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

