<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/</link>
	<description>Cooperation Without Coercion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Less</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Less]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@JSD  I don&#039;t see anyone here arguing that migrants are libertarians.  The point is that, factually, migration has clearly been in the direction of low welfare states and away from high welfare states, making the supposed &quot;welfare magnet&quot; argument against immigration look pretty silly.  As for motivation, we probably agree that people who move are more ambitious than people who don&#039;t move, and it is likely they are moving in order to find work.  Clearly it isn&#039;t to find welfare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JSD  I don&#8217;t see anyone here arguing that migrants are libertarians.  The point is that, factually, migration has clearly been in the direction of low welfare states and away from high welfare states, making the supposed &#8220;welfare magnet&#8221; argument against immigration look pretty silly.  As for motivation, we probably agree that people who move are more ambitious than people who don&#8217;t move, and it is likely they are moving in order to find work.  Clearly it isn&#8217;t to find welfare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Some Dude</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Just Some Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Immigrants flee the high welfare states to go to the low welfare states.&quot;

Actually, immigrants flee poor states to go to prosperous states. It does not follow, however, that immigrants understand why the new state is more prosperous than their old state--or that their cultural bias toward collectivism suddenly disappears when crossing the border into low-welfare state. Many liberal Democrats have fled California to escape high taxes. Does that mean they have abandoned liberalism? I doubt it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Immigrants flee the high welfare states to go to the low welfare states.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, immigrants flee poor states to go to prosperous states. It does not follow, however, that immigrants understand why the new state is more prosperous than their old state&#8211;or that their cultural bias toward collectivism suddenly disappears when crossing the border into low-welfare state. Many liberal Democrats have fled California to escape high taxes. Does that mean they have abandoned liberalism? I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our New Net Zero Immigration Nirvana &#171; Libérale et libertaire</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Our New Net Zero Immigration Nirvana &#171; Libérale et libertaire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Two years ago at Freedom Democrats, I posted an article on Libertarianisim and Immigration that sort of languished at the time. A year later, my republishing of the article managed to achieve some degree of notoriety with Less Antman&#8217;s endorsement. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two years ago at Freedom Democrats, I posted an article on Libertarianisim and Immigration that sort of languished at the time. A year later, my republishing of the article managed to achieve some degree of notoriety with Less Antman&#8217;s endorsement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reporter</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article. BTW, the Libertarian International Organization at http://www.Libertarian-International.org continues to encourage interest in universal free working residency, and activists are working with Ecuador to present a Pan-American treaty. Step by step.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. BTW, the Libertarian International Organization at <a href="http://www.Libertarian-International.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.Libertarian-International.org</a> continues to encourage interest in universal free working residency, and activists are working with Ecuador to present a Pan-American treaty. Step by step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Less Antman: &#8216;There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration&#8217; &#124; Independent Political Report</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Less Antman: &#8216;There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration&#8217; &#124; Independent Political Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 22:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Antman at Anarchy Without Bombs (originally posted June [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Antman at Anarchy Without Bombs (originally posted June [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Less</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Less]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Summerspeaker

Most libertarians do make anti-militarism a key issue:  libertarians started and are the major contributors to antiwar.com, and the LP has a solid anti-intervention platform.  I agree that anti-militarism MUST be a key issue (maybe even THE key issue) for anyone who is serious about liberty.  Of course, those whose opposition to militarism mysteriously disappeared at noon on January 20, 2009 (or at noon on January 20, 2001) are beneath contempt.

And, of course, I share your view that freedom of movement must be brought to the forefront, which is why I wrote this post.  I haven&#039;t seen any presence of Minutemen in any libertarian organizations, though (I&#039;m not denying that some Minutemen may choose that self-definition, much to our dismay).

By the way, I think the list of critical items where broad cooperation is possible can be lengthened a bit: in addition to the two you mentioned, the war on drugs, corporate welfare, and central banking.  And there is currently a big shift in attitudes taking place within the libertarian movement regarding intellectual property (especially among ancaps), so I&#039;m hoping that can be added to the list soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Summerspeaker</p>
<p>Most libertarians do make anti-militarism a key issue:  libertarians started and are the major contributors to antiwar.com, and the LP has a solid anti-intervention platform.  I agree that anti-militarism MUST be a key issue (maybe even THE key issue) for anyone who is serious about liberty.  Of course, those whose opposition to militarism mysteriously disappeared at noon on January 20, 2009 (or at noon on January 20, 2001) are beneath contempt.</p>
<p>And, of course, I share your view that freedom of movement must be brought to the forefront, which is why I wrote this post.  I haven&#8217;t seen any presence of Minutemen in any libertarian organizations, though (I&#8217;m not denying that some Minutemen may choose that self-definition, much to our dismay).</p>
<p>By the way, I think the list of critical items where broad cooperation is possible can be lengthened a bit: in addition to the two you mentioned, the war on drugs, corporate welfare, and central banking.  And there is currently a big shift in attitudes taking place within the libertarian movement regarding intellectual property (especially among ancaps), so I&#8217;m hoping that can be added to the list soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summerspeaker</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Summerspeaker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If libertarians made this and anti-militarism key issues I would have considerably more respect for them. Though a left anarchist, I&#039;m willing to work with capitalists in dismantling the horrifically oppressive present immigration system. Unfortunately, these days you have a fair number of Minutemen types calling themselves libertarians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If libertarians made this and anti-militarism key issues I would have considerably more respect for them. Though a left anarchist, I&#8217;m willing to work with capitalists in dismantling the horrifically oppressive present immigration system. Unfortunately, these days you have a fair number of Minutemen types calling themselves libertarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Z</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this - the immigration &quot;debate&quot; is another one of those issues where I was beginning to feel increasingly alone in my views.  It&#039;s a recurring theme on my blog, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this &#8211; the immigration &#8220;debate&#8221; is another one of those issues where I was beginning to feel increasingly alone in my views.  It&#8217;s a recurring theme on my blog, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rad Geek People&#8217;s Daily 2010-06-21 &#8211; Monday Lazy Linking</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rad Geek People&#8217;s Daily 2010-06-21 &#8211; Monday Lazy Linking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration. Less, Anarchy Without Bombs (2010-06-19). It is almost 30 years to the day since Libertarian Party Presidential Nominee Ed Clark set off a firestorm of criticism within the party for indicating that he didn’t think free immigration should be immediately adopted.  One of the strongest criticisms came in a post-mortem of that campaign by Mr.... (Linked Saturday 2010-06-19.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is no libertarian case for restricted immigration. Less, Anarchy Without Bombs (2010-06-19). It is almost 30 years to the day since Libertarian Party Presidential Nominee Ed Clark set off a firestorm of criticism within the party for indicating that he didn’t think free immigration should be immediately adopted.  One of the strongest criticisms came in a post-mortem of that campaign by Mr&#8230;. (Linked Saturday 2010-06-19.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Border Patrol Catches Americans Trying to Get to Mexican Clinic &#171; Anarchy Without Bombs</title>
		<link>http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/2010/06/19/there-is-no-libertarian-case-for-restricted-immigration/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Border Patrol Catches Americans Trying to Get to Mexican Clinic &#171; Anarchy Without Bombs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchywithoutbombs.com/?p=160#comment-263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] dL&#8217;s inspired comment on my last [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dL&#8217;s inspired comment on my last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
